000 04185nam a22005895i 4500
999 _c101668
_d101668
001 978-3-030-23141-5
003 DE-He213
005 20210117123514.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 190823s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783030231415
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-030-23141-5
_2doi
040 _cМУБИС
050 4 _aLB2300-2799.3
072 7 _aJNM
_2bicssc
072 7 _aEDU015000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aJNM
_2thema
082 0 4 _a378
_223
100 1 _aOleksiyenko, Anatoly V.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 1 0 _aAcademic Collaborations in the Global Marketplace
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Anatoly V. Oleksiyenko.
250 _a1st ed. 2019.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2019.
300 _aXII, 239 p. 1 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aKnowledge Studies in Higher Education,
_x2566-7106 ;
_v6
505 0 _a1. Linking Globally, Acting Locally: Changes and Challenges -- 2. Major Research University: A Case of Glonacal U -- 3. The Bureaucracy of Change: More Bureaucracy Than Change? -- 4. “Steering Core”: Strategy-Makers and Competing Agendas -- 5. “Developmental Periphery”: Embracing Markets, Defying Hierarchies -- 6. “Academic Heartland”: Epistemic Pressures, Entrepreneurial Responses -- 7. Synergies and Conflicts: Stimuli, Logistics, and Costs -- 8. Glonacality of Research Universities -- Appendices. .
520 _aThis book explains why conflict between the institutional and human agencies is an unavoidable outcome of competing local, national and global agendas at a major research university. It illustrates this by means of a case-study of Glonacal U, a university which belongs to the category of exceptional institutions that excel due to an established organizational culture of academic freedom, research excellence, shared governance, and intellectual leadership. The book shows how such a university may succumb to anxiety when neoliberal managers seek to exploit stakeholder doubts about university sufficiency, relevance, and performance in national and global markets and hierarchies of knowledge products and status goods. As top-down pressure for strategic choices in scientific partnerships increases at the world-class university, grassroots resistance to centralization increases also in order to remind the research university leaders that intellectual work and academic freedom are interdependent and central to building capacities for impactful global science. Productive global linkages are prerogative of academics who take full responsibility for success of project implementation and outcomes in scholarship and practice.
650 0 _aHigher education.
650 0 _aSchool management and organization.
650 0 _aSchool administration.
650 0 _aInternational education .
650 0 _aComparative education.
650 0 _aKnowledge management.
650 0 _aGlobalization.
650 1 4 _aHigher Education.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O36000
650 2 4 _aAdministration, Organization and Leadership.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O17000
650 2 4 _aInternational and Comparative Education.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O13000
650 2 4 _aKnowledge Management.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/515030
650 2 4 _aGlobalization.
_0https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912030
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030231392
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783030231408
830 0 _aKnowledge Studies in Higher Education,
_x2566-7106 ;
_v6
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23141-5
942 _2ddc
_cEBOOK